How would you compare Hughes’ “Salvation” with Hawthorne’s “Young Goodman Brown in terms of content, substance, passion, and situation at stake?

Journal Writing Activity In-Class Analysis of Langston Hughes’ “Salvation” and Nathaniel Hawthorne’s “Young Goodman Brown.”1. How would you compare Hughes’ “Salvation” with Hawthorne’s “Young Goodman Brown in terms of content, substance, passion, and situation at stake?2. Compare and contrast the conflict or problem the two protagonists are confronted with. How do they handle the conflict? Which of the two protagonists helps readers better understand the level of hypocrisy, double standards, and pretext that often characterizes the dynamics of religion across the globe? Support your analysis with textual evidence.3. Analyze how the two protagonists attempt to resolve the situation in which they find themselves. Do they sound remorseful, negligent, or nonchalant in their resolutions? Provide textual evidence to support your analysis.4. Discuss the lessons or moral you have learned from the two texts and back them up with textual evidence.5. Establish a strong connection between the themes and observations from the two texts with the real life situation in the United States today. Take cognizance of the behaviors of religious leaders, the impact on their congregants, and the overall ripple effect on the and socio-economic and political developments of the country.

Describe white collar crimes.

Why is health care fraud such “big business” in the United States? Select a health care fraud case from your reading, the videos, or your other research, and discuss the importance of curbing the criminal behavior highlighted in the case you selected.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KsPlwKbGxE8http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WcEegIZX10shttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BLYxq3GDXyI

Discuss the ethics of Capital Punishment.

a) Write an essay on a specific human rights issue of your choice. It could be an exploration of a topic covered during the semester or an entirely new item. The problem should be directly or indirectly related to human rights.b) Your paper should demonstrate an understanding of human rights ethical concepts and theories in your analysis of the topic.I.E., You may indicate that you argue from a consequentialist, rights, etc. perspective. It will be interesting to learn that your vocabulary on specific issues has changed as you incorporate the prevailing notions in human rights studies such as positive and negative rights, positive and negative peace, etc. into your conversation.c) The paper should not be merely a collection of information about a subject but should demonstrate a critical analysis of the topic.I.E., What are some of the arguments with which you agree or disagree? Why or why not? What conclusions have you drawn from the research? I am not expecting you to produce a scholarly paper, but that you dig more in-depth than the familiar arguments about the problem.

Discuss two things that surprised you or perhaps stood out to you in reviewing these documents with regard to the treatment of white collar cases.

This week you have been provided with the The DOJ Justice Manual and the US Sentencing Commission Guidelines. The Justice Manual is the document that guides the policies, procedures, and protocols underlying the charging and investigative decisions of federal prosecutors. The US Sentencing Guidelines is a document that guides judges in making sentencing decisions in federal criminal cases. The document also guides prosecutors, defense attorneys, and probation officials in making sentencing recommendations to courts.As you can see, both of these documents are quite extensive. Review both documents paying close attention to how each document tends to address white collar crimes. Discuss two things that surprised you or perhaps stood out to you in reviewing these documents with regard to the treatment of white collar cases. Please be specific in your response.https://www.justice.gov/jm/justice-manual