Category: Essay Help

Research proposal Assignment
Topic: Effect Of Bullying On The Mental Health Of Youth
The information below is just what the “already written” proposal should entail. Can you please edit (restructure the assignment) to match the requirement below. Feel free to add any information that is missing in the assignment.

1.Introduction/Research Purpose should include:

State the main purpose of the study.
Rephrase the purpose as a research question.
Include a hypothesis for studies that require testing a proposed causal relationship between variables. State your hypothesis as a null or as an alternative hypothesis.
Conceptualize: define the main concepts in your research question/hypothesis.
Identify the indicators that will be used to measure the variables being studied. Note that indicators are not required for qualitative studies.

2. Context of Study:

Provide a brief description of where the study will be conducted. This should include information about socio-economic, cultural, and geographical factors that influence the environment within which the study is being conducted.

I found and reviewed the article The new age of customer impatience: An agenda for reawakening logistics customer service research. This article is a peer reviewed article that explains the need for further research in logistics customer service. When reviewing this article I found a few things that made me question some of the research. The first item was a quote the author used to describe and define what logistics customer service was. Here is the quote, “In times of tough competition when many organizations offer similar products in terms of price, features, and quality, customer service differentiation can provide an organization with a distinct advantage over the competition.” (Lambert et al., 1998, p. 40). While this quote is accurate, I found that the quote is very general in nature when it is referencing customer service. The author used this quote to refer that the original person to say that, Lambert, was saying this in reference to logistics customer service. I took the quote as customer service as a whole is what provides the differentiation, not solely the logistics side of the equation. The authors then go on to use Lambert’s name saying that his “quote embodies the nature of academic research in the 1990s that recognized LCS as an intangible commodity” (Daugherty et al., 2019). Again, on the surface it appears that the author spun Lambert’s original quote fit the narrative that additional research is needed when it comes to logistics customer service. The other issue that I questioned was the authors depth of research. The only reason I say this is because they talk about how there is limited new research and that there is a need for new research related to logistics customer service but often reference article that were published in 2018. I think there may be a bias present, although very subtle, when they are wanting to point the research in the specific direction of customer impatience. The reason I say this is because of the wording they use when they stated “We introduce the concept of customer impatience and offer suggestions for specific LCS-related research topics. We suggest particular attention be given to the concept of customer impatience and the implications for customer service” (Daugherty et al., 2019). Initially, they called for more research overall, but then wanted to just focus on research related to their concept. This is just my initial thoughts on the article and I would need to review all of the source material in order to provide an 100% accurate assessment.

Daugherty, P., Bolumole, Y., & Grawe, S. (2019). The new age of customer impatience An agenda for reawakening logistics customer service research. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 49(1), 4–33. http://dx.doi.org.ezproxy1.apus.edu/10.1108/IJPDLM-03-2018-0143

In the article “The new age of customer impatience: An agenda for reawakening logistics customer service research” discuss how companies need to start focusing on how customer service plays are larger factor when it comes to the movement of products from the manufacturers to the consumer. The article speaks about how there is not enough research that has been completed on customer satisfaction in recent years when it comes to logistic customer service, specifically, omnichannel and e-commence. The major point of the article is basically that consumers are becoming more impatient on the wait times for the items that they ordered. They feel that everything should be readily available and that companies are not meeting these needs rapid enough.

The authors were very good about being unbiased when writing this article. They pulled research from the late 90s and early 2000s to get an idea of the background information for what was going on with customer satisfaction in logistics historically verse what is important with customers in recent years. However, they did state that their just is not enough research that has been done when it comes to what customers truly want now that a large amount of shopping is completed online and what companies have been to help improve overall satisfaction. The article talks about companies look more at soft issues and not hard issues when it comes to customer happiness. Shippers do that to some extent. But not everyone
scrutinizes those ‘softer’ factors (such as effective and relevant communication, ease of
doing business, etc.), the same way they do easy-to-define performances measures” (p. 41).
If a company masters the fundamentals (on-time delivery, high fill rate) and wants to do an
even better job, the soft issues or people-related issues offer a way to gain greater
advantage. A halo effect may emerge: “Doing exceptionally well at a handful of these soft
issues gives the impression to the shipper that you’re doing exceptionally well on the
others” (Douglas, 2016, p. 42). The authors of this article are showing how many companies are not looking into overall satisfaction.

Based of personal experience working at a transportation company I would agree that customers nowadays do want their deliveries faster. We as a company do not look into the satisfaction of the customer when it comes to deliveries as much as we should, because we are too focused on the overall operation. This Is something that companies really need to start looking into, because we have lost major accounts, because of lack of customer satisfaction.

Daugherty, P., Bolumole, Y., & Grawe, S. (2019). The new age of customer impatience: An agenda for reawakening logistics customer service research. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 49(1), 4–32. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-03-2018-0143

Douglas, M. (2016), “At your service”, Inbound Logistics, Vol. 36 No. 12, pp. 40-45.

A) Suggest and describe additional factors from the client’s history that may have not been addressed that might influence the treatment planning and management;

B) Suggest and describe 1 intervention to add to the treatment plan that might reduce or prevent negative symptoms

C) Suggest and describe 1 technique to add to the treatment plan that might reduce or prevent negative symptoms

What are the implications of the future of fabrication for international trade, transportation, and logistics?

Assignment: Evidence-Based Project
Is there a difference between “common practice” and “best practice”?

When you first went to work for your current organization, experienced colleagues may have shared with you details about processes and procedures. Perhaps you even attended an orientation session to brief you on these matters. As a “rookie,” you likely kept the nature of your questions to those with answers that would best help you perform your new role.

Over time and with experience, perhaps you recognized aspects of these processes and procedures that you wanted to question further. This is the realm of clinical inquiry.

Clinical inquiry is the practice of asking questions about clinical practice. To continuously improve patient care, all nurses should consistently use clinical inquiry to question why they are doing something the way they are doing it. Do they know why it is done this way, or is it just because we have always done it this way? Is it a common practice or a best practice?

In this Assignment, you will identify clinical areas of interest and inquiry and practice searching for research in support of maintaining or changing these practices. You will also analyze this research to compare research methodologies employed.

To Prepare:

Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry.
Based on the clinical issue of interest and using keywords related to the clinical issue of interest, search at least four different databases in the Walden Library to identify at least four relevant peer-reviewed articles related to your clinical issue of interest. You should not be using systematic reviews for this assignment, select original research articles.
Review the results of your peer-reviewed research and reflect on the process of using an unfiltered database to search for peer-reviewed research.
Reflect on the types of research methodologies contained in the four relevant peer-reviewed articles you selected.
Part 1: An Introduction to Clinical Inquiry

Create a 4- to 5-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following:

Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest. This clinical issue will remain the same for the entire course and will be the basis for the development of your PICOT question
Describe how you used keywords to search on your chosen clinical issue of interest.
Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles you selected.
Provide APA citations of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected.
Part 2: Identifying Research Methodologies

After reading each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, use the Matrix Worksheet template to analyze the methodologies applied in each of the four peer-reviewed articles. Your analysis should include the following:

The full citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format.
A brief (1-paragraph) statement explaining why you chose this peer-reviewed article and/or how it relates to your clinical issue of interest, including a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest.
A brief description of the aims of the research of each peer-reviewed article.
A brief description of the research methodology used. Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed-methods approach. Be specific.
A brief description of the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles you selected.

1. Explain what is most important in long-term financial success.
2. Explain what a healthcare firm’s primary financial objective should be.
3. List some of the major nonhospital and non-physician sectors of the healthcare industry.
4. Discuss the major sources of revenue and expenses of medical groups.

• Each of your posts (original posts & replies) must demonstrate your understanding of the topic.
• Post should show connections between lecture content, textbook content, and discussion.
• Relate new information with material previously covered in the class as well as with personal experience.
• Discuss at a critical level – don’t just recite facts from your reading, discussion, or lecture.
• Critical discussion includes your opinion of items mentioned, but also includes the reasons you hold that opinion, and why it may be inconsistent or consistent with what you’ve learned. Justify your reasoning with facts. How does what you’re presenting affect present and future situations?
• Posts that are replicates of other student’s posts will result in a lower grade.

Read the article and look at the Power Point in the module to better understand sentinel events. Then find an example of a specific sentinel event from a reputable website, The Joint Commission or news, and write the following:

Investigate a specific sentinel event, describe and discuss the event. Provide an entire overview of what happened during the sentinel event. (Please pick a specific event that happened to a patient and discuss that event, i.e., if you wanted to look at postpartum hemorrhage that led to a patient death, you would find an article that specifically talks about an actual event to a patient that experienced the hemorrhage, then died.)Identify the factors that contributed to this event.Describe the role of nursing on prevention of future events.

Read the scenario below and complete the assignment as instructed.
Scenario
In Community X (population 20,000), an epidemiologist conducted a prevalence survey in January of 2012 and reported an HIV prevalence of 2.2%. Over the next 12 months, the department of health reported an additional 50 new HIV cases between February 2012 and January 2013. The total population stayed constant at 20,000.
Part 1
1. How many people had HIV in January 2012? Present or describe the formula you used to arrive at your answer.
2. Calculate the incidence rate assuming no HIV-related deaths over the 12-month period. Present or describe the formula you used to arrive at your answer. Be sure to clearly indicate the numerator and denominator used in your calculation and include an appropriate label for the rate.
In a summary of 200-250 words, interpret the results and discuss the relationship between incidence and prevalence. Discuss whether or not the epidemiologist should be concerned about these new HIV infections, assuming a previous incidence rate of 0.5 per 1,000 person-years prior to this updated risk assessment.
Part 2
A rapid test used for diagnosing HIV has a sensitivity of 99.1% and a specificity of 90%. Based on the population prevalence of 2.2% in 2012, create a 2×2 table showing the number of true positives, false positives, false negatives, and true negatives. Calculate the positive predicative value and negative predictive value for this test. Refer to the “Creating a 2×2 Contingency Table” resource for guidance.
In 200-250 words, discuss whether or not the epidemiologist should recommend this test as part of a universal HIV screening program. Provide rationale for your recommendation applying the positive and negative predictive values. Present or describe the formula you used to arrive at your answer.

Create a comprehensive communications campaign for a project at your organization (this could also be a club, or fictional organization if needed). This campaign should describe the intent of the campaign, the expected outcomes and the plan for achieving those outcomes. The plan should include a list of stakeholders (internal and externals) and how you plan on involving those stakeholders.