Determine whether your choice from Question 3 would differ in slow-cycle and fast-cycle markets.

Business-Level and Corporate-Level StrategiesOverviewIn this assignment, you are to use the same corporation you selected and focused on for Assignment 1: Strategic Management and Strategic Competitiveness and Assignment 2: External and Internal Environments.Research the company on its own website, the public filings on the Securities and Exchange Commission EDGAR database, the University’s online databases, the Nexis Uni database, and any other sources you can find. The annual report will often provide insights that can help address some of these questions.RequirementsWrite a six- to eight-page paper in which you do the following:Analyze the business-level strategies for the corporation you chose to determine the business-level strategy you think is most important to the long-term success of the firm and whether or not you judge this to be a good choice. Justify your opinion.Analyze the corporate-level strategies for the corporation you chose to determine the corporate-level strategy you think is most important to the long-term success of the firm and whether or not you judge this to be a good choice. Justify your opinion.Analyze the competitive environment to determine the corporation’s most significant competitor. Compare their strategies at each level and evaluate which company you think is most likely to be successful in the long term. Justify your choice.Determine whether your choice from Question 3 would differ in slow-cycle and fast-cycle markets.Use at least three quality references. Note: Wikipedia and other websites do not quality as academic resources. Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:This course requires use of new Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The format is different than other Strayer University courses. Please take a moment to review the SWS documentation for details.Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; references must follow SWS or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required page length. Use the Assignment 3 Template [DOC] to ensure that your assignment meets the above requirements.The specific course learning outcome associated with this assignment is as follows:Determine business-level and corporate-level strategies for a corporation’s long-term success comparable to the competitive environment.Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic and organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the scoring rubric.

Discuss whether you believe that the recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance is a religious issue or a sign of respect for the United States.

Religion and Politics have traditionally been highly debated topics in our society. Recently, the Pledge of Allegiance has added to this debate.American citizens have generally recited the Pledge of Allegiance at important ceremonies ranging from presidential inaugurations to the beginning of the school day. The pledge has a great deal of sentimental value to many Americans, but also creates a great deal of controversy for others.Review the Supreme Court case Elk Grove Unified School District v. Newdow, which highlights the debate.Please include the following:Summarize the salient points of the Supreme Court case Elk Grove Unified School District v. Newdow.Discuss the levels of the court through which the case evolved before it reached the Supreme Court.Explain the decision of the Supreme Court in this case in brief.Explain the fundamental impact that the court decision in question has had on American society in general and on ethics in American society in particular. Provide a rationale for the response.Discuss whether you believe that the recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance is a religious issue or a sign of respect for the United States.Discuss whether or not you think public schools should be allowed to recite the pledge.Use at least three (3) quality academic resources. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources.Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:This course requires use of Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The format is different than other Strayer University courses. Please take a moment to review the SWS documentation for details.Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:Examine the current ethical issues inherent throughout the criminal and civil justice systems.Describe the dispensation of justice through the criminal and civil justice systems.Use technology and information resources to research issues in the criminal court and the judicial process in America.Write clearly and concisely about the American court system using proper writing mechanics and SWS style conventions.

Write a 5-page research paper discussing the reasons why divorce rates are so high in the US.

Project must be created in a narrative format. Bullets points and lists are unacceptable, unless the bullet points and lists are follow by a an extensive detailed description or explanation that follows the narrative format – at least a paragraph (6 sentences). Write a 5-page research paper discussing the reasons why divorce rates are so high in the US. In this paper you must explain the following a) The impact of divorce on the family b) The impact on the family systems (governments agencies and other organizations that support families.)

Describe issues related to the safety and security of each sports event.

The sports league is NLF, and bring a team to Alabama. -Research Reports Each student is required to submit two separate written research reports. Each report must be a minimum of 7 pages (including the Cover page, The Table of Contents, and the Works Cited) with 5 pages of content; 12-point font. Report #1: Marketing of Sports Select a sports league and a city in which to introduce an expansion team from that league. – Background information: History and current state of the sports league – What city would you choose to expand to and why? How do the demographics and psychographic/lifestyle factors match the league’s current fan base? ▪ Use secondary data sources to describe the population of the market, including the demographic breakdown (e.g. Census.gov), as well as the psychographics of the market (e.g. Claritas PRIZM or VALS). – Describe the climate of the location and the type of stadium needed. – Describe your options and the rationale behind your final choice for the location of the stadium. – Describe the proposed financing of your stadium (public/private). Will taxes be raised to finance it? Will jobs be created? How else will your stadium be used? – Describe the local media- newspapers, TV stations, radio stations. How and where would you advertise the team? – Describe the other competing and/or complementary attractions, such as amusement parks, entertainment options, and other professional and/or amateur sports teams. – Describe issues related to the safety and security of each sports event. Do crime factors require you to implement any specific security measures? – List and describe the major local corporations that will be likely to provide sponsorship dollars. – End with a summary and conclusion.

How could group work contribute to the healing process over individual work?

Pick any population you would like to work with (ie., children, couples, adults, adolescents, veterans, health workers…) and design a group in response to the COVID-19 situation. Identifying therapeutic factors, basic tasks, and group therapeutic techniques including approaches specifically around collective processing of trauma/mourning/resiliency. How could group work contribute to the healing process over individual work? Also include therapist managing their own “experiencing” or transference in this group. 6-8 pages, 4-6 Sources

Where does this culture change initiative belong on the “depth” scale in figure 5.1, between shallow and deep change?

This is a story of successful organizational culture change. How can we explain this success? As you read this story, consider the following questions: 1. Which dimensions of the 7-S framework, described in chapter 4, did Eric Collins and his senior management colleagues focus on in order to change Nampak’s culture? Reminder: The “hard” dimensions are strategy, structure, and systems. The “soft” dimensions include staff, skills, style, and shared values, or superordinate goals. 2. Which dimensions of the 7-S framework were not affected? 3. Where does this culture change initiative belong on the “depth” scale in figure 5.1, between shallow and deep change? In your judgement, would a different emphasis across the seven factors of that framework have produced deeper change, with better results, and how? Context Nampak was a South African–owned bottle and plastics manufacturer with 600 factory workers and 80 managers in the United Kingdom. A typical manufacturing company, it focused on costs, investing in machinery and processes rather than people. Labor costs were low, and the company had been very successful. In 2007, the newly appointed managing director Eric Collins realized that the company had driven efficiencies as far as it could using traditional approaches. He decided to add value through people. Problem Although the company was successful, the organizational culture was poor. People were treated badly and morale was low. The blame culture spread to customers. Complaints at one site reached 25 a month, which was damaging for a company that relied on three key customers. Apart from hiring, firing, and discipline, Nampak had no established human resource management policies and practices. In a staff satisfaction survey in 2007, 80 percent said that they would not recommend Nampak to friends and family as a place to work. Looking at the survey results, the new HR director, Cathie WrightSmith, concluded, “There was everything wrong with this business that you can think of.” There were also problems with the executive board, who were status-conscious and accustomed to having a high degree of control, with only a dozen people making all the key decisions.Solution Collins met customers to get their critical feedback on the company. But when he met his own employees in “Challenge Collins” sessions, to hear their grievances in person, he was shocked. The level of dissatisfaction was high, and the anger was directed at him. However, Collins wanted to give staff the opportunity to vent their frustrations, and to show that they had a leader who was listening. Wright-Smith ran focus groups, asking staff what would make Nampak a better place to work. Three themes emerged. The first was communication; people did not know what was going on, and they were not involved. Second, staff did not feel that they had training and development opportunities, or a career with the company. Third, line managers rarely provided feedback on their performance. This led to the design of a new LO 5.4(Continued)162 Chapter 5 What Changes—and What Doesn’t? performance management system, based on what employees said that they wanted: personal development, and not objectives with tick boxes. Some line managers had never had conversations like this with their staff before, and they now did this monthly. Line managers were seen as “dogsbodies,” although they were key to shaping the company’s culture. To emphasize their importance, they were offered the first training and development opportunities, a “leadership excellence” course, exploring influence, motivation, and team development methods. This was so successful that it generated demand from other managers for similar training. New initiatives developed rapidly. Half the workforce were trained in a range of subjects, assessment centers replaced the traditional selection process, and induction and buddy schemes were introduced. The company launched a senior leaders program, a fast-track route for high-potential staff, undergraduate and graduate placement schemes, and a suggestions scheme offering financial rewards. A corporate social responsibility program linked with local schools, inviting pupils into the factory and sending staff to schools to talk about recycling. Shop floor staff worked with the schools attended by their children, and some staff came back on their days off to show people around the factory, with pride. Wright-Smith ran sessions for directors on leadership and emotional intelligence.Outcomes Collins said, “We’ve had a paradigm shift in culture.” In the 2010 staff survey, 80 percent said that they would recommend Nampak to friends and family as a place to work, reversing the 2007 position. In addition, 90 percent said that they were satisfied with their jobs, and 98 percent said that their managers listened to them. Overhead costs per million bottles made improved by 7 percent. No closures or layoffs were needed to make savings. Customer complaints fell to zero. Collins said, “We’re just a more collaborative, committed organization with pride in our work.” The main costs, according to Collins, concerned the commitment of time and focus (Smedley, 2011).

Based on your previous experiences of organizational change, what are your expectations in terms of what events/actions/outcomes usually follow the announcement of a program of change in an organization?

People’s previous experiences of change provide them with a “script” – a set of assumptions/beliefs as to what happens in a situation of organizational change. Based on your previous experiences of organizational change, what are your expectations in terms of what events/actions/outcomes usually follow the announcement of a program of change in an organization?

Do you find yourself tending to one of these more than the others when you think about ethics? Can you explain why?

This is a short assignment, three pages (900 words) maximum. Title: “The Locus of Ethics” Ethics is a complicated thing, and trying to define it requires care to understand its various components. How do the readings and discussions help us to define and describe the differences and logical relationships between “believing/knowing”, “acting”, and “character”? Do you find yourself tending to one of these more than the others when you think about ethics? Can you explain why? No external sources required. But you may quote something from the reading I attached if you want.