1.Based on the systems described in Network Solutions what will be the disadvantages and negative outcomes from implementing this PM system and why?2. Overall what is the overlap between the Network Solutions and the ideal PM system? Describe the gap? Is there an ideal or perfect PM system? What is the goal of a PM system?
There are FOUR articles (Dreher, Daly, Rodgers, Gushee) in the Debate “Have Christians Created a Harmful Atmosphere for Gays?” Note: when you click on the link, you may have to also click on “Skip to Content” at the top of the page to go to the articles.
What this means is that your questions should not simply ask peers to recall material but rather ask them to engage with the material from the readings in more complex ways (i.e. analysis, evaluate, apply). Try to be creative with the questions you develop. (write a short answer for each question)
What conclusions do the authors draw about the first amendment and free speech in today’s climate? Why are the similarities or differences between the two articles important?
Discuss the impacts of difficulty conceiving children.
Discuss the impacts of difficulty conceiving children.
Write a political science/ intro to government.
In general, based on what you read (or regardless of what you read) how well do you feel marketers target women segments? Compare and contrast the issues involved in targeting women to targeting other kinds of segments—specifically, consumer psycho-graphic segments and B2B small business segments. https://www.businessnewsdaily.com/7217-adweek-rethinking-marketing-to-women.htmlhttps://hbr.org/2013/09/how-women-decide
website below and the Mazower reading to answer questions 1-6https://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/1.What were some of the global consequences of WWII and the Holocaust?2.What new legal terms and definitions came about as a result of the Nuremberg Trials against Nazi war criminals? Discuss the enduring significance of these trials, as well as their various failings. 3.Read through the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Do you feel that all of the articles in the declaration are being observed today? Why might it be difficult to actually enforce universal standards of what constitutes an “inalienable right”?4.Discuss the displacement of people across Europe in the immediate aftermath of WWII. What various groups found themselves displaced, and what was done to help them?5. What different paths to recovery did East and West Germany take, both during and immediately after the era of occupation? How did they differ politically, ideologically, and economically? 6. How did the political landscape of Europe change, in the immediate post-war era? What new challenges did Europeans face?Questions: 7-9 please refer to Mary fulbrook “reckonings” reading and the short youtube video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XeRCEp4XzXI7. Discuss some of the strategies that some Germans of the Nazi era used, in the aftermath, to deflect (or to manage), feelings of guilt and responsibility. In particular, please address the varying levels of guilt and how this relates to a process of ‘reckoning.’8. In what ways have post-war generations had to reckon with the Nazi past? Discuss this in relation both to survivors of the Holocaust, as well as to the descendants of Nazi perpetrators. 9. Regarding the film: How has commemoration become central to German national identity, for recent generations? Questions 10-12, please refer to the Jeffrey Olick reading and the website below: https://www.dw.com/en/holocaust-remembrance-in-germany-a-changing-culture/a-4720354010. How does Jeffrey Olick’s argument differ from the portrait of a “culture of commemoration” that otherwise characterizes Germany today? And:11. In what ways is it impossible for Germany to have a “normal” relationship to its national history? What is the danger, in normalizing the past?12.Regarding the DW article: How has remembrance culture changed in Germany, in recent years, and what new political developments are connected to this change?
The Supreme Court decision in Miller (No 2) [2019] UKSC 41 was deeply flawed in two key respects. First, it offended the separation of powers because activist judges became mired in politics and thus over-stepped the strict, clear limits of their role; to judgeaccording to law. Second, the court ignored the established constitutional distinction between law and convention by effectively enforcing ministerial accountability to Parliament.Discuss this criticism with reference to relevant case law and constitutional literature. To what extent do you agree with it, and why?
