Tag: Assignment help

Review zootopia the movie and write how it combines with racism.

Examine ONE character in the novel, Ocean at the End of The Lane, other than the narrator. How does the author use characterization to establish theme?

CONSIDERATIONSAND EVALUATIONThere are three key things to consider when designing and implementing your project: audience, affordances of your chosen medium, and interventionwith course materials.Since many formats for the project may leave some or much of these considerations implicit, itis recommended that students include some written information separatefrom the projectproductthat explains what sorts of decisions were made with respect to audience, affordances, and intervention(e.g. a paragraph ina document accompanying your submission).(1) Audience:who is your target audience?What other audiences mightview or hear your product. In other words, who might be auditors, overhearers, eavesdroppers? How haveyour choice of medium and the content of your project(e.g. how academic/ technical your content is) responded to your identified audiences?(2)Affordances:how does your selected medium for your project shape the possibilities for communication and the probable ways that audiences might engage with your project? How was your choice of medium related to your target audience? Are there any ways that your selected medium has limited what you were able to accomplish with your project?(3) Intervention:how does your project’s intervention connect to course materials and key theories about language and social justice? If you have chosen for these theories to remain implicit in your final product, why did you make this choice? Be as specific as possible about which theories, which aspects of which theories, and where you got this information from.Students will be evaluated primarily in terms of how each project addresses these three considerationsin the final product and/or in an accompanying document. If these considerations are primarily addressed in theaccompanying document, it needs tobe fairly clear to mehow the accompanying document is connected to the final product (in other words, if a student writes a great accompanying document but that document has nothing to do with the final product, the student will not have earned a high mark on the project).The evaluation is holistic and fairly subjective and there is no rubric for this assignment beyond this information. Try not to worry too much about evaluation, please also source this book does not include the other 4 sources (Avineri, Netta, Laura R. Graham, Eric J. Johnson, Robin Conley Riner, and Jonathan Rosa (eds.). (2019). Language and Social Justice in Practice. New York: Routledge.[LSJ]

“How Biotechnology will impact my life in the future?” Statement: a.) In your own words, write “How Biotechnology will impact my life in the future?”

Two of the following questions will appear on the exam. You will have to answer them both. Be sure to read each question carefully and answer all parts of the question. You response should be a well-written, carefully thought out response to the issues raised. This is a formal piece of college-level writing and will be graded as such. (9 points each) Discuss the impact that European contact with the Americas had on Native American life. Reference at least two specific civilizations or tribes in your response. Describe how slavery developed and entrenched itself in the British North American colonies. Include a discussion of how racial ideologies developed. Compare and contrast the different standards of living, political participation, and economic development generally in the southern British colonies versus the northern ones in the 1600s. Did these differences continue into the 1700s? While historians long argued that the abundance of free land and the egalitarian nature of the frontier encouraged the development of democratic institutions, evidence to the contrary exists. Discuss and evaluate this statement. Include in your discussion the colonial need for land and labor and how that need was met.

Step 1: Choose a theme, such as gender issues, generational conflict, identity, freedom, war, heroism, love vs duty, power, etc. Step 2: Compare and contrast how the theme is interpreted, critiqued, and/or re-envisioned in two films. One of the films must be a film we have watched in the course; the second film may be a film of your choice but should be an American (or foreign) film that is widely-available and well-known to US audiences.In your paper, you should focus on how the films use cinematic and narrative techniques to emphasize themes, develop characters and their relationships, or critique the society in which the films were created. Overall, your goal is to develop an argument about how the films construct the theme and why the films interpret the theme as they do. Focus on having a strong thesis statement, a well-organized paper with clear topic sentences for each paragraph, and a conclusion that sums up your paper First Movie selection ·Kontroll = Control (2003, Director Nimród Antal. Hungarian audio English captioned) Crna macka, beli macor = Black Cat, White Cat (1995, Director Emir Kusturica, English Subtitles) Daisies (Vera Chytilova, Czechoslovakia, 1966, 75 min) A Short Film about Killing (Krzysztof Kieślowski, Poland, 1988, 94 minutes) The Lives of Others (Florian Donnersmarck, Germany, 2006, 137 min) Before the Rain (Milcho Manchevski, Macedonia, 1994, 116 min) Ashes and Diamonds (Andrzej Wajda, Poland, 1958, 103 minutes) Ida (Pawel Pawlikowski, Poland, 2013, 80 min) Little Vera (Vasili Pichul, USSR, 1988) Mirror (Andrei Tarkovsky., USSR, 1975, 106 min) Leviathan (Andrei Zyagintsev, Russia, 2014, 141 min) Elena (Andrei Zvyagintsev, Russia, 2011, 110 min) Adam’s Rib (1992, Director Vyacheslav Krishtofovich, Russian Audio, English Subtitles)

1) Consider the ways the Republic of Gilead oppresses its citizens; what practices of brainwashing, conditioning, &/or dehumanizing do they use in order to control others? Compare the processes/practices the Republic of Gilead uses to slavery in America.

Given all the potential biases and mistakes and outright lies the media or eyewitnesses can make, especially now in the age of the internet, how can we reliably determine what has ​actually happened in any given news story or criminal investigation? You must first consider which factors most interfere with our ability to find the “truth” (is it lies and deception and misinformation? Is it human error? Is it incompetent story telling, by reporters and/ or witnesses? Is it personal and political biases? You can decide which exact factors to consider). And then you must devise some way to minimize, if not eliminate, those interfering factors. Whatever you come up with, you must be specific, you must explain yourself, and you must support your point of view at length.