Describe an ADIK information system you have used recently that would perform better if the display/interface was changed or improved.

Describe an ADIK information system you have used recently that would perform better if the display/interface was changed or improved. Describe the deficiencies and what you’d do to change the display/interface to allow for better communication of knowledge. Provide examples both in terms of the “technological-physical factor” and the “human-organization factor.” Below is the link to the lecture please listen carefully.

Create a table with a column for each of the PRSA’s statements of professional values, and then include elements of the case in each column.

Option #2: Corporate Reputation and Ethical Concerns Refer to the PRSA Board of Ethics and Professional Standards Code of Ethics (http://www.prsa.org/aboutprsa/ethics/codeenglish/#.VN4HZeasWVM) and build an ethical assessment of the case below. Create a table with a column for each of the PRSA’s statements of professional values, and then include elements of the case in each column. Write a paper answering the question: Is there significant ethical and/or reputation concern for the organization? If your response is yes, focus on evaluating the key ethical problems. If your response is no, focus on explaining why the case is not an ethical issue. Case: You are the director of public relations for Megabucks Energy Company, a Houston-based Fortune 500 oil and gas exploration and production company. Megabucks has been experiencing declining profits due to drops in oil and gas prices. Recent drilling on one of the company’s properties in the Java Sea has produced promising results of a significant new oil and gas reservoir. Although geological testing is incomplete, rumors are flying in the marketplace about the potential of this new well to significantly increase Megabucks’s profits. Senior management asks you to prepare a news release that responds to these rumors and downplays the significance of the find. As part of your research, you discover internal reports that show that this new well is, indeed, a major discovery and that further testing is planned simply to determine the size of the reservoir. Your paper should meet the following requirements: Be between 2-3 pages in length, with a separate title page and reference page. Formatted according to CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements (Links to an external site.). Include a minimum of 2 current and credible sources. Sources should be adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue. Present an effective table as part of the evidence for the argument. Make a strong evaluation that grounds the observations in the course material.

Explain the impact of gender, cultural values and dimensions, and group dynamics in the scenario.

Scenario: Culture, Psychology, and Community Imagine an international organization has approached you to help resolve an inter-group conflict. You are an authority in cross-cultural psychology and have been asked to serve as a consultant based on a recent violent conflict involving a refugee community in your town and a local community organization. In the days, weeks, and months leading up to the violent conflict, there were incidents of discrimination and debates regarding the different views and practices people held about work, family, schools, and religious practice. Among the controversies has been the role of women’s participation in political, educational, and community groups. Assignment: (6 pages excluding title page and reference page): Part 1: Developing an Understanding (2 pages) Based on the scenario, explain how you can help integrate the two diverse communities so that there is increased understanding and appreciation of each group by the other group. (Note: Make sure to include in your explanation the different views and practices of cultural groups as well as the role of women.) Based on your knowledge of culture and psychology, provide three possible suggestions/solutions that will help the community as a whole. In your suggestions make sure to include an explanation regarding group think and individualism vs. collectivism. Part 2: Socio-Emotional, Cognitive, and Behavioral Aspects (2 pages) Based on your explanations in Part 1, how do your suggestions/solutions impact the socio-emotional, cognitive, and behavior aspects of the scenario and why? Part 3: Gender, Cultural Values and Dimensions, and Group Dynamics (2 pages) Explain the impact of gender, cultural values and dimensions, and group dynamics in the scenario. Further explain any implications that may arise from when working between and within groups.

Describe in three separate paragraphs how each perspective would view or explain the issue.

Refer to Chapter. 1 to review the three major sociological perspectives. all three perspectives (functionalism, conflict and interactionism) to analyze any current issue: Give a brief introduction that identifies the issue you have chosen and why. Describe in three separate paragraphs how each perspective would view or explain the issue. Include elements of culture and how humans learn, develop, and become integrated into society. Provide a conclusion that discusses which perspective you think is most applicable to the issue or how the three perspectives complement one another in understanding the issue.

Discuss how you evaluated the credibility of the resources used.

You are applying for a position with the juvenile court as a prevention specialist. As part of the interview, the juvenile judge has asked you to put together a 10–15 slide PowerPoint evaluating three current prevention and diversion programs used to prevent or deter juvenile delinquency, abuse, and neglect. The judge had also expressed difficulty locating programs for the growing Hispanic and Samoli populations within the community. That includes programs that understand the cultural differences among these various groups. Use three of the slides to create an outline of a new program that may work based on your evaluations that address the various cultural needs of Hispanic and Samoli groups within the community. Your project should provide an analysis of the three programs you will reference. This includes a detailed overview of each program. Include an overview of the statistics. How successful is the program? This is determined by looking at recidivism or relapse/return rates. Evidence based practice should drive your individual program. How does the previous, researched programs fail to support or support various cultural needs? Be sure to use the speaker notes for any lengthy information. NOTE: This Assignment may require outside research. Use research sources including academic journals to support your work.Discuss how you evaluated the credibility of the resources used.

Describe the data set you used, as well as the variables. Explain which method you used: cross-tab, mean comparison or regression.

1. Clearly explain your research question and why it is important. 2. Literature review. Analyze the findings of your scholarly, peer-reviewed sources, organizing them around key themes. How will your research fit in? You must use at least three scholarly sources. 3. Hypothesis. Clearly state your hypothesis, identifying the independent and dependent variables, as well as the expected relationship between them. Include at least one relevant control variable, and an explanation of how you expect it will affect the relationship between the independent and dependent variables. 4. Methodology. Describe the data set you used, as well as the variables. Explain which method you used: cross-tab, mean comparison or regression. Why did you choose this particular method? 5. Results. What did you find? Clearly explain your findings, including measures of the strength of the relationship, its direction, and statistical significance. In an appendix, include not only your syntax, but also the tables you generated, such as a cross tab, with the results for chi square, lambda and somers’s d (whichever is relevant for your variables) and p values. 6. Conclusions. Did your findings confirm your hypothesis? What are the implications of your findings? What should be done next? This is where you get to state your own opinion. It is the only place in this paper where you can offer your own thoughts about this research. 7. Appendix. Include your SPSS output, with your netid clearly visible in the header. Use APA style for Works Cited page and in-text citations. No abstract necessary.

Explain your topic and state the specific question that you are addressing (be sure to incorporate any relevant feedback you got from the instructor on your first paper).

Introduction (approximately 100 words) Explain your topic and state the specific question that you are addressing (be sure to incorporate any relevant feedback you got from the instructor on your first paper). Presentation of an Argument Describe the scholarly source on one side of the issue and summarize the key points made. (approximately 100 words) Present what you see as the main argument from that source in standard form, with the premises listed above the conclusion. (approximately 100 words) Evaluate the quality of the reasoning in this source. You may address questions such as: How adequately the article supports the premises with research and how strongly the premises of the argument support the truth of the conclusion. (approximately 200 words) Presentation of an Opposing Argument Describe the scholarly source on the other side of the issue and summarize the key points made. (approximately 100 words) Present what you see as the main argument from that source in standard form, with the premises listed above the conclusion. (approximately 100 words) Evaluate the quality of the reasoning in this source. You may address questions such as: How adequately the article supports the premises with research and how strongly the premises of the argument support the truth of the conclusion. (approximately 200 words) Evaluation of Arguments in Non-Scholarly and Scholarly Sources (approximately 200 words) Discuss the differences in the quality of the reasoning or in the degree of support in the sources that you analyzed (Scholarly and Popular Resources (1) (Links to an external site.)). Some specific types of questions you might address here include: Who is the target audience? What types of motives may be influencing these authors? Discuss any logical fallacies in any of the sources.