What are the differences between convergent and divergent thinking? What factors can stimulate divergent thinking and why?

1. Provide definition of pooled interdependence, sequential interdependence, and reciprocal interdependence in groups then briefly explain the various effects of interdependence on teamwork and team design? 2. What are the differences between convergent and divergent thinking? What factors can stimulate divergent thinking and why?  3. Why, in general, are entrepreneur networks more successful in organizations than clique networks.   The main text used is “making the team” author Leigh Thompson. Each question is worth 20 marks please help me to earn maximum on same.

Write a thorough review of the literature which includes a description of your administrative law problem, theories related to this problem, frameworks for analyzing the problem.

The research paper is worth 300 points. Your research paper should be 12-15 pages in length. Your paper should include the following sections: (1) An introduction that includes your research topic/question and a road map to the paper; (2) a thorough review of the literature which includes a description of your administrative law problem, theories related to this problem, frameworks for analyzing the problem, etc.; and (3) a conclusion that summarizes your main findings, discusses the limitations of your research, and posits future research questions. If you are concerned about the idea of developing a theoretical framework, you may use one of the frameworks provided in the textbooks. Consult the next page for ideas on how to develop a topic for the research paper. You should start by describing your basic administrative law problem and then dig deeper into it. An “A-level” paper should include a solid theoretical framework for the analysis. Your literature review should be analytical, not summative. I do not want you to engage in a sequential discussion of each separate article or book. Reviews that follow the format “Author A said blah, blah, blah,” “Author B said this and that,” “Author C said so and so,” are unacceptable presentations of the literature. Your sources can be diverse, but I want to see a nice mix of materials. You must use some academic, peer- reviewed journals for this paper. I strongly encourage the use of the VPN available through ULM to access library resources, JSTOR, and various publications through public administration journals (examples include: Public Administration Review, Public Personnel Management, Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, Public Integrity, et al.). Furthermore, I would encourage you to explore law review journals from various law schools, as they incorporate a blend of both scholarly analysis while retaining the legal focus necessary to explore administrative law. You may not cite Wikipedia as a source.

What is the pattern? Describe this, including citations to the work of other theorists who have observed similar patterns.

Organizing the Information: What did you see or observe about gender or ethnic/racial parity or inequality? Is this a broader pattern or a one-time episode? What is the evidence for a broader pattern? What do the quantitative data tell you? Do they suggest that the parity or inequality you see is part of a larger picture? What concepts or theories (classical or contemporary) have you studied that might be useful in explaining the pattern? Make a list. How do these fit together into a theory? Go back to Week 3, “What Counts as Theory?” and review the material, especially the chapter from Rojas and Swedborg. Draw a diagram of the concepts you plan to use including connections that can explain what causes what. Writing the Paper: What is your thesis? Write your thesis as a statement about the causal relationships you intend to describe and support. What is the pattern? Describe this, including citations to the work of other theorists who have observed similar patterns. Why does the pattern exist? Develop a theory to explain the pattern using concepts and other theories studied in the course. How do the data you have collected support or refute the thesis? What conclusions can you draw? Proofread your paper for spelling, grammar, and punctuation.

What is the ‘Mary’ problem against physicalism, and how effective is it?

Please select one question from the list below, and make sure to clearly state the question you are answering at the start of your essay. (1) What is the ‘Mary’ problem against physicalism, and how effective is it? (2) What are philosophical zombies, and what problem are they meant to pose for physicalism? How plausible is the zombie argument? (3) What is the argument from illusion, and how is it used to motivate indirect realism over direct realism? Is it effective? (4) What is the problem of fiction, and how do you think one should respond to it? (5) Can the B-series capture everything there is about the nature of time? If not, what does it leave out? (6) What are abstract objects? Are there any? (7) What is the most persuasive mereological account of the relationship between parts and wholes? Defend your answer. (8) What is an indispensability argument? What problems do such arguments face? (9) How should we demarcate genuine science from pseudo-science? (10) Critically evaluate the merits of scientific realism by focusing on what you take to be either the strongest argument in its defense or the strongest argument against it. (11) Why is there something rather than nothing? (12) What is the problem of evil, and how compelling is it as an argument for God’s non-existence? (13) Is it ever rational to have faith in God? (14) Does immortality have any essential role to play in an account of the meaning of life? (15) Is death necessary for one’s life to be meaningful? (16) If all that exists is the natural world, then can life ever be meaningful?