Category: Essay Help

Working With Descriptive Statistics SPSS Output Open SPSS and obtain an output (as in the tutorial videos) with the following results highlighted: 1. Determine the statistics for each gender as follows: Frequency Counts, Mean, Standard Deviation, Minimum, and Maximum. 2. Graphing and Descriptive Stats in SPSS: Create a bar graph with gender (axis X) and blood sugar (axis Y). Data Set Use the following data set for this assignment: 1. You have a group of patients observed with a diagnosis of Diabetes and their blood sugar levels are listed below based on gender. Men: 74, 71, 75, 248, 388, 505, 42, 21. 2. Female: 62, 68, 61, 71, 68, 80, 390, 148. Summary Write a 250-500 word summary of your results and how this statistical analysis may be applied to your prospectus.

A long piece of written work that offers a detailed, sustained and critical treatment of a chosen topic. It differs from an essay in requiring a more sustained treatment of a topic, greater depth of analysis and wider consultation of sources and materials. It should address a well-defined research question, specified at the outset, and present a logically developed argument, the claims of which are supported by evidence where necessary. It is an analytic undertaking, not a descriptive account of the topic under investigation, nor is it a review of books and articles the candidate read. While originality is often a requirement for doctoral study, masters dissertations too can strive to make an original contribution to the field. This can take the form of exploring previously neglected primary sources, undertaking an original theoretical analysis or interpretation of existing literature, or using primary material to develop your own critique of existing scholarly arguments. Dissertations typically follow one of four methods: 1-A single case study is used to assess, explore, validate or critically examine an argument, theory or theoretical perspective advanced in the literature; 2-A comparative case study is undertaken where a process, development or institution is examined in two or more settings; 3-Quantitative data is used to test existing arguments or to form a new hypothesis; 4-A critical analysis of a theoretical argument or perspective is advanced that engages closely with primary texts. Structure: Although structure varies according to the topic and methodology chosen, a dissertation typically consists of several parts, which should be formally indicated as chapters. A possible structure is as follows: Introduction: The introduction outlines the research question, identifies the argument, indicates the methodology adopted, and illustrates how the intended line of analysis supports the proposed argument. It can also offer a plan of work and briefly identify the contributions of the study. (500-1,000 words?) Literature review: The topic is placed in its academic context by reviewing the relevant scholarly literature and relating the research question to academic debates. (1,500-3,000 words?) Analysis/Discussion: Usually 2-4 chapters. Primary and secondary source material is presented, with an appropriate account of how material was gathered and how sources might be interpreted in the light of their authorship. This is where the argument or interpretation is methodically advanced in the light of a critical analysis of the material. (7,500-10,000 words?) Conclusion: Presents a summary of the findings of the dissertation, relates these to the argument outlined in the introductory chapter and states precisely what has been demonstrated. It can also reflect on broader contextual or scholarly implications. (500-1,500 words?) A good dissertation is what the two departmental markers (first marker and the second marker) agree to be a good dissertation. For the majority of dissertations, the first marker is the supervisor, and the second marker is a faculty member whose research and teaching interests are deemed appropriate for the topic. Dissertations are marked according to the following assessment criteria: 1-Definition of research question, argument or hypothesis : There has to be a crystal clear, scholarly relevant research question. The study must answer this question via an equally clear argument/hypothesis stated at the very outset and developed methodically and consistently throughout. (Whats your problem? What are you saying?) 2-Consideration of alternative arguments, knowledge of relevant issues and debates : The discussion must illustrate that the candidate is aware of key issues and debates, and is able to locate the argument and analysis within a wide range of alternative viewpoints. (Can you tell us how your argument stacks up against what others say about the problem? Why should we believe you?) 3-Critical vs descriptive approach : While there is room for description in some dissertations, on the whole the analytic approach should be critical, inquisitive. Intellectual progress entails challenging established viewpoints. (Be brave, leave no stone unturned!) 4-Appropriateness of methodology, quality of evidence : The study must be methodical, systematic, although different methodologies can be used. For empirical work, the candidate must show excellent grasp of the context. (How do we know you are not just pulling the wool over our eyes with fancy words?) 5-Use of relevant sources, knowledge of relevant literature : The study must consult the relevant literature(s) and sources throughout, showing familiarity and grasp. A typical masters dissertation has 25-50 academic sources + other material . databases, media etc. (Can you prove you really did your homework?) 6-Style and presentation : The study must be written clearly in terms of grammar, spelling, punctuation. It must be tightly organised, and written in formal language while avoiding excessive jargon. The text must be properly cited and referenced by observing appropriate academic conventions. (Do you take this task seriously? Do you have respect for what you are doing?)
Show more

Schapiro, N. A. (2009). Confidentiality and access to adolescent health care services. Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 24(2), 133136. Burns, C. E., Dunn, A. M., Brady, M. A., Starr, N. B., Blosser, C. G., & Garzon, D. L. (Eds.). (2017). Pediatric primary care (6th ed.). St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier. Chapter 7, Developmental Management of School-Age Children (pp. 101-120) Gagan, M. J. (2009). The SOAP format enhances communication. Kai Tiaki Nursing New Zealand, 15(5), 15. Hagan, J. F., Jr., Shaw, J. S., Duncan, P. M. (Eds.). (2017). Bright futures: Guidelines for health supervision of infants, children, and adolescents (4th ed.). Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics. You receive a phone call from a mother who is concerned that her son is using drugs. The 16-year-old boy is seeing you in the afternoon for a follow-up for acne. The mother requests that you obtain a drug test during the visit, but she does not want her son to know he is being screened or that she requested screening because I dont want him to stop trusting me. Review this weeks media presentation, as well as Developmental Management of School-Age Children and Developmental Management of Adolescents in the Burns et al. text and the Schapiro article in the Learning Resources. Think about confidentiality laws regarding providers, school-age children, adolescents, and their families. Select one of the three provided scenarios. Reflect on the providers role and responsibility regarding confidentiality between the patient and the patients family in the scenario. Consider the appropriate way for the provider to respond and facilitate the care of the patient in the scenario you selected. Think about interventions and strategies that the provider should use to address the issues presented. By Day 3 Post an explanation of the providers role and responsibility regarding confidentiality between the patient and the patients family in the scenario you selected. Explain how the provider should appropriately respond and facilitate the care of the patient in the scenario. Include interventions and management strategies that the provider should use to address the issues presented. Rubric Outstanding Performance Excellent Performance Competent Performance Proficient Performance Room for Improvement Main Posting: Response to the discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. 44 (44%) – 44 (44%) Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s) is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. supported by at least 3 current, credible sources 40 (40%) – 43 (43%) Responds to the discussion question(s) is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth supported by at least 3 credible references 35 (35%) – 39 (39%) Responds to most of the discussion question(s) is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. 50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth supported by at least 3 credible references 31 (31%) – 34 (34%) Responds to some of the discussion question(s) one to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references 0 (0%) – 30 (30%) Does not respond to the discussion question(s) lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. contains only 1 or no credible references Main Posting: Writing 6 (6%) – 6 (6%) Written clearly and concisely Contains no grammatical or spelling errors Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style (%) – (%) Written clearly and concisely May contain one or no grammatical or spelling error Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Written concisely May contain one to two grammatical or spelling error Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style (%) – (%) Written somewhat concisely May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors Contains some APA formatting errors 0 (0%) – 4 (4%) Not written clearly or concisely Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style Main Posting: Timely and full participation 10 (10%) – 10 (10%) Meets requirements for timely and full participation posts main discussion by due date 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) NA 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) NA 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) NA 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Does not meet requirement for full participation First Response: Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources. 9 (9%) – 9 (9%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings responds to questions posed by faculty the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives (%) – (%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings (%) – 8 (8%) Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting (%) – 7 (7%) Response is on topic, may have some depth 0 (0%) – 6 (6%) Response may not be on topic, lacks depth First Response: Writing 6 (6%) – 6 (6%) Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English (%) – (%) Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues Response to faculty questions are answered if posed Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources Response is written in Standard Edited English (%) – (%) Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed Few or no credible sources are cited 0 (0%) – 4 (4%) Responses posted in the discussion lack effective Response to faculty questions are missing No credible sources are cited First Response: Timely and full participation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Meets requirements for timely and full participation posts by due date 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) NA 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) NA 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) NA 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Does not meet requirement for full participation Second Response: Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources. 9 (9%) – 9 (9%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * responds to questions posed by faculty the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives (%) – (%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings (%) – 8 (8%) Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting (%) – 7 (7%) Response is on topic, may have some depth 0 (0%) – 6 (6%) Response may not be on topic, lacks depth Second Response: Writing 6 (6%) – 6 (6%) Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English (%) – (%) Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues Response to faculty questions are answered if posed Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources Response is written in Standard Edited English (%) – (%) Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed Few or no credible sources are cited 0 (0%) – 4 (4%) Responses posted in the discussion lack effective Response to faculty questions are missing No credible sources are cited Second Response: Timely and full participation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Meets requirements for timely and full participation Posts by due date 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) NA 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) NA 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) NA 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Does not meet requirement for full participation
Show more

Describe Various Contemporary International Taxation Issues

Project – Organizational Chart & Stakeholder Relationship Diagram The organizational chart is the standard way to depict reporting relationships. The relationship diagram is a helpful way of assessing interactions and relationships in an organization or process. You will be using these tools and other information to describe the organization and identify the stakeholder relationships for a health care organization of your choice. Organization: The United States Department of Veterans Affairs Narrative Based on the organizational chart and relationship diagram, submit a 5 page narrative, excluding references, that describes the organization and what you have learned in this exercise. The paper should be in APA format with appropriate references. The following is a structure you may use for this analysis: ?Brief Background or description of the organization, including the mission or purpose, number and types of employees, and a description of the stakeholders/customers. (approximately 1 page) ?Review of the organizational structure and the effectiveness (or lack of) for meeting the mission and vision of the organization. (approximately pages) ?Review of the stakeholder relationship diagram/map explaining the relationships, interconnections, and impacts of the relationships on the organization (approximately 2 pages) ?Your analysis of what you learned using the tools in this assignment. (approximately page) ?Citations and References Organizational chart – Note any characteristics that make the organizational structure unique. The organizational chart does not need names, just position titles. Relationship Diagram – Identify how your organization relates to at least seven (7) of its external stakeholders or customers, including at least two (2) other entities in the broad health care community.
Show more

Describe land conflicts in your country or any country / land management

Draft and justify five intelligence questions that the President might ask the IC that pertain to national security challenges currently facing the United States. Identify whether each question is strategic or tactical.

Instructions: Develop a personal philosophy and framework acknowledging professional and accrediting agency competencies relating to the role and scope of practice of the family nurse practitioner. Identify a nurse theorist or professional accrediting agency that provides the foundation for this philosophy development. Describe the type of educational courses and professional requirements required for APN professional certification and licensing within the state of Texas that you will practice in and compare to at least one other state for evaluation purposes. Identify the precise application process for boards, your state regulations for application for prescriptive practice, and issues related to APN practice within your state. Evaluate and discuss APN roles and prescriptive privileges and impact on client safety and care Compare the differences between prescriptive authority, credentialing, and clinical privileges and how each of these impact client safety and care Evaluate the development of the advanced practice nurse role from a global perspective. Compare at least 2 countries and how similar or dissimilar the APN roles are in other countries.

Leadership Project Guidelines A unique feature of this course is the means by which it allows students make use of all that they have learned about leadership and to apply that learning to professional contexts in which they are currently involvedwork or otherwise. This is accomplished through a carefully designed project in which students have the opportunity to exercise leadership. The project should include working closely with other people to effect or initiate positive change (for example, influencing others, motivating others, coordinating others.) Projects that do not involve interaction with people and effecting or initiating positive changefor example, ones involving only gathering information, shadowing a leader or interning for a leaderare unacceptable, because they do not involve the exercise of leadership. Examples of acceptable projects: o Coordinating efforts involving several people to create a new strategic plan for an organization or organizational unit/department o Leading a task force of people involved in revamping the way an organization or organizational department/unit assesses itself, and communicating the new assessment plan to all relevant constituents o Developing with others a plan to motivate them to improved performance, and then initiating that plan with measures to ensure it can be sustained The leadership project paper should be 12 to 15 pages in length and should cover the following: o A description of the problem on which the project focused; for example, how the problem was identified and what real evidence there is for its presence, why the problem has an impact on the organization, why solving the problem can make a significant difference to the organization; o The means identified to address the problem: for example, changing current operations (procedures, culture, perceptions), strategic planning, adding or shifting resources, revising or adding organizational assessment mechanisms, rethinking the customer/market focus, rethinking leadership practices. (Note: If you propose the latter, you should have discussed it throughout the project with leaders within the organization.) o The results of the project: that is, what effect will it have (or has it already had) on the organization and on organizational performance? o Personal reflections on the project, its results, and how previous learning in the leadership program was brought to bear during the project. In your practicum you should consider the following: ?Meet a need of the organization. Time and resources are limited, so support the organization by helping them with real needs. ?Support your career goals. One of the goals of the Leadership Studies program is to support you in your career. ?Enjoy the process.

A literature review/proposal that includes a unique research question, a coherent analysis of the literature, and a research design that includes plausible methods for answering the research question at hand. Intermediate level literature reviews should exceed minimum expectations and show a higher level of thinking about the topic area and research question. The literature review addresses an identified question that is well-supported by a sufficient number of well-chosen research articles, shows clear attention to organization, proceeds logically, and clearly identifies shortcomings of existing research. The proposed research should be designed in such a manner that it adequately fills identified gaps and should offer a plausible method for gathering the appropriate data to answer the question at hand. REQUIRED SECTIONS OF THE PAPER – (These are also the ONLY Level 1 Headers the paper will have): Abstract: (150-250 word) summary of the entire paper. The abstract should include the problem area, gap in the research, proposed research design and potential contribution of the research. Background: (Referred to as the Literature Review)- 10 pages total – The literature review should proceed logically from the general problem area down to the specific research being proposed. Lit review includes the following: – An identified problem area and its significance, in terms of scope, impact, urgency, etc. – A clear research question that can be addressed within the scope of a 10-page paper. – Identification and evaluation of other relevant research that has been conducted and why this body of research is not sufficient to answer the question at hand (. does existing research not ask the right questions, or measure the right variables? Do they only focus on a particular age? Or not take age into account?) – Adequate explanation of concepts and a clear statement of the expectations or research hypotheses. Method: Proposal of new (. improved) research (3 pages total). Papers should clearly explain the primary method (research design) that will be used to gather information, which includes: Participants, Instrumentation, and Procedure as subheadings. In addition, the proposal should address how the study will sufficiently protect the welfare of the participants of their study. If a survey instrument is to be constructed, include a sample of the survey, as well as how responses might be coded or analyzed. All aspects of any interventions should be well explained. Data Analysis and Anticipated Results: The data analysis process should be clearly explained along with the anticipated outcomes of the study. Data analysis should detail how demographic data will be reported, as well as what statistical tests will be run to test hypotheses (if applicable). Discussion: The implications of the research should be explored, as well as ways that the proposed research may meaningfully contribute to existing knowledge. Minimum of 25 citations. The paper should be scholarly in tone and authoritative. This is not an essay (. opinion piece), a reaction paper, or a report. Papers should clearly articulate the purpose and significance of the study and supported ideas with references to relevant literature.