Compare and Contrast the ideas of Charlotte Gilman and Patricia Collins in their views of Gender Inequality. See how they would address this social issue.
Research Paper – Principles of Management Topic: An in-depth managerial analysis of a selected organization, e.g., a corporation, company, firm or association (ideally, an organization which the students have some interest in joining as an employee or associate). The Research Paper must be submitted . 1. What is the mission of the organization? a. What planning methodologies are utilized? b. Define and assess the organization’s strategy. c. Identify its customers and/or constituents and its competitors. 2. Perform a SWOT Analysis on the company 3. Describe how the firm is organized. a. Note the formal structure (organizational charts); also what informal entities exist? b. Describe the decision-making process. c. How does the organization manage change? 4. What is the leadership style? a. Who are the organization’s heroes? b. Describe the motivational environment. c. Assess the effectiveness of the organizational communications. 5. Comment on the processes for control a. Note the type of controls. b. Describe the financial controls. c. Describe the operational controls. d. What role(s) do information systems play? 6. Evaluate any innovative managerial practices. a. How is entrepreneurship encouraged? b. What ethical dilemmas are faced? c. What sources of “employee empowerment” are utilized? d. What role(s) does technology play? 7. Assess you interest in joining the organization a. Why or Why Not? b. How would you join? Methodologies: 1. Literature review (e.g. Bio’s of founders) 2. Employee interviews 3. Promotional materials assessments (including web sites) 4. Industry Analysis
Notice: You need to find a book!!!! This assignment consists of a Book Design Analysis (worth 10%, experiential learning). In other words, you have to analyze the design and typographical aspects of a book (recently published). This Book Design Analysis must take into account the elements and principles of typography and book design covered in Weeks 9, 10, and 11 lectures (slides and readings). Lectures and slides on Bibliography might be useful as well. The grading rubric is mainly based on how many elements and principles of book design and typography you will be able to identify in the book you are analyzing. In order to conduct your analysis, you are invited to choose a book recently published (2018 or 2019). You can pick a book from home I encourage you to go to a bookstore, so you have a wider selection to choose from, which means more chances to find a book relevant for your analysis. I do not encourage you to pick up a book from a library. In fact, library books usually don’t have a dust jacket (which is an important component of book design). NB: if you choose a book from a bookstore, you don’t have to buy it! Just spend some time at the bookstore to analyze your book, and most importantly, take dozens of photos. In fact, the photos you will take will be an essential component of your analysis (you have to embed them into your analysis). Images of the book downloaded from Internet cannot be used. You can only use the photos of the book that you took by yourself. E-book or PDF books cannot be used. Only printed books and, again, only photos of a physical printed book that you took by yourself. Once you have chosen the book and taken photos, you can start your analysis, taking into account the elements and principles of typography and book design. All visual elements of the book must be analyzed, such as the dust jacket, as well as the internal pages, layout, font, visual aids, etc. Your analysis must be very visual, which means providing comments about the photos that you took, highlighting visual details, particulars of the typographical elements, etc. Eventually, you will put all together and upload your analysis as a PDF file on Quercus. There are no limits in terms of word-count or number of pages, thus there is no minimum or maximum number of pages/words. I’m confident you will be able to present your analysis in the best way possible.
1. Provide definition of pooled interdependence, sequential interdependence, and reciprocal interdependence in groups then briefly explain the various effects of interdependence on teamwork and team design? 2. What are the differences between convergent and divergent thinking? What factors can stimulate divergent thinking and why? 3. Why, in general, are entrepreneur networks more successful in organizations than clique networks. The main text used is “making the team” author Leigh Thompson. Each question is worth 20 marks please help me to earn maximum on same.
Discuss someone you know or a famous person you believe was falsely labeled. Explain what they were labeled (type of criminal), why and how. What affect did the labeling have on this person (personally/socially/work/etc.)?
Write a paper fully describing a legal issue in public administration, include the pros and cons of the legal issue.
Write an argumentative paper on why the government should restrict scientist from altering and enhancing unborn children.
The research paper is worth 300 points. Your research paper should be 12-15 pages in length. Your paper should include the following sections: (1) An introduction that includes your research topic/question and a road map to the paper; (2) a thorough review of the literature which includes a description of your administrative law problem, theories related to this problem, frameworks for analyzing the problem, etc.; and (3) a conclusion that summarizes your main findings, discusses the limitations of your research, and posits future research questions. If you are concerned about the idea of developing a theoretical framework, you may use one of the frameworks provided in the textbooks. Consult the next page for ideas on how to develop a topic for the research paper. You should start by describing your basic administrative law problem and then dig deeper into it. An “A-level” paper should include a solid theoretical framework for the analysis. Your literature review should be analytical, not summative. I do not want you to engage in a sequential discussion of each separate article or book. Reviews that follow the format “Author A said blah, blah, blah,” “Author B said this and that,” “Author C said so and so,” are unacceptable presentations of the literature. Your sources can be diverse, but I want to see a nice mix of materials. You must use some academic, peer- reviewed journals for this paper. I strongly encourage the use of the VPN available through ULM to access library resources, JSTOR, and various publications through public administration journals (examples include: Public Administration Review, Public Personnel Management, Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, Public Integrity, et al.). Furthermore, I would encourage you to explore law review journals from various law schools, as they incorporate a blend of both scholarly analysis while retaining the legal focus necessary to explore administrative law. You may not cite Wikipedia as a source.
Prepare a presentation or Speech on Team leadership model of a chosen company.
Organizing the Information: What did you see or observe about gender or ethnic/racial parity or inequality? Is this a broader pattern or a one-time episode? What is the evidence for a broader pattern? What do the quantitative data tell you? Do they suggest that the parity or inequality you see is part of a larger picture? What concepts or theories (classical or contemporary) have you studied that might be useful in explaining the pattern? Make a list. How do these fit together into a theory? Go back to Week 3, “What Counts as Theory?” and review the material, especially the chapter from Rojas and Swedborg. Draw a diagram of the concepts you plan to use including connections that can explain what causes what. Writing the Paper: What is your thesis? Write your thesis as a statement about the causal relationships you intend to describe and support. What is the pattern? Describe this, including citations to the work of other theorists who have observed similar patterns. Why does the pattern exist? Develop a theory to explain the pattern using concepts and other theories studied in the course. How do the data you have collected support or refute the thesis? What conclusions can you draw? Proofread your paper for spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
