Write an essay on Infectious Disease.

This paper is for an epidemiology course in a family nurse practitioner program. The concepts of epidemiology must be applied to a communicable disease. Choose ONE communicable disease from the following list to complete the paper on: Chickenpox Tuberculosis Influenza Mononucleosis Hepatitis B HIV Chlamydia Gonorrhea Syphillis Measles Pertussis The paper is to be a maximum of 2 pages (not including title page or reference page) and must have a minimum of 3 scholarly references. It is imperative to address each of the following bullet points in the paper: Include the following in the paper: Description of the communicable disease (causes, symptoms, mode of transmission, complications, treatment) and the demographic of interest (mortality, morbidity, incidence, and prevalence). Describe the determinants of health and explain how those factors contribute to the development of this disease. Discuss the host factors, agent factors (presence or absence), and environmental factors. Explain the role of the community health family nurse practitioner (case finding, reporting, data collecting, data analysis, and follow-up).

Magnet Designation -Nursing

Assignment 1: Impact of the Forces of Magnetism on Nursing Practice Description: This assignment provides you with an opportunity to discuss with your classmates your understanding and opinion of the value of the Magnet Program. The discussion question guides you to identify what you know about the Magnet Program, explore its value, and why you believe it is valuable or not to nursing practice as well as how you see it impacting your practice. Tasks: In a 1- to 2-page Microsoft Word document and online discussion, explore the impact the Forces of Magnetism has on nursing practice in Magnet-designated organizations. Do you believe Magnet designation is beneficial to nursing practice? Be sure to address: Benefits of designation Forces of Magnetism The Force of Magnetism you consider most beneficial and why Impact the Magnet Program has on your nursing practice regardless of whether you practice at a Magnet-designated organization or not

Discuss privacy in the Constitution

WRITER: 366464 See GRADING CRITERIA (see attachment) for proper structure/layout of your case study. 2 Examples: Make sure the Exegetical Method is applied (The task of exegesis involves looking at the biblical text and setting forth your understanding of the text in a way that is comprehensible to others and illuminating for yourself and for them). The conclusion is strong and clearly summarizes the research presented in the body of the paper. Page Count: 3.5-4 pages (be careful not to go over 4 pages) This case study must have a Christian worldview integrated throughout. ***Bluebook Citation Required – Harvard Law Review, Bluebook: A Uniform System of Citation*** Case study instructions: Topic: privacy in the Constitution Briefly describe the case of Planned Parenthood of Southeast Pennsylvania v Casey – https://www.oyez.org/cases/1991/91-744 – , text page 459465. In your case study, explain the important aspects of this case from the perspective of each group of justices opinions. Demonstrate how the justices used privacy in the Constitution and how its understanding has caused a difference in opinions. Things to show in the case study: Define what is meant by privacy in the Constitution. Explain how privacy relates to the right to an abortion. Contrast the various arguments for and against the right of privacy as it relates to marriage, abortion, procreation, sodomy, and the right to die.

Describe if the current Mission and Vision Statements are effective and why.

For this activity, analyze both the Mission and Vision Statements of the approved firm you will use in your Strategic Audit Report. This analysis could consist of the following steps for both your Mission and Vision Statements:(Firm Whole Food) -Identify your firms Mission and Vision Statements. -Describe if the current Mission and Vision Statements are effective and why. -Recommend new Mission and Vision Statements, if need be, and support your work. -Develop a Mission Statement and or a Vision Statement, if your firm does not have one. Support the new statement. Mission Statement Guidelines: An MS should be 3-4 sentences. It should use action words that represent today (the present) and not the future. It should tell the world just what, when and how the firm is doing today. It should not be a Vision Statement, which represents the future. Most current MS, used by businesses, are incorrect. Hint! Vision Statement Guidelines: No more than 12 words! Fit on a tee shirt! Futuristic- We want to be the global leader in…”. All employees should know their VS by heart.

The Film Festival Circuit:Assess the advantages and disadvantages of stakeholder analysis as a model for understanding how film festivals operate.

Assess the advantages and disadvantages of stakeholder analysis as a model for understanding how film festivals operate. Please explore with reference to a specific film festival/film festivals of your choice. Further Reading:Cheung, Ruby (2010). Funding Models of Themed Film Festivals. Film Festival Yearbook 2: Film Festivals and Imagined Communities. Eds. Dina Iordanova with Ruby Cheung. St. Andrews: St. Andrews Film Studies. pp74103. Fischer, Alex (2013). Sustainable Projections: Concepts in Film Festival Management. St Andrews: St Andrews Film Studies. Iordanova, Dina (2010). Mediating Diaspora: Film Festivals and Imagined Communities. Film Festival Yearbook 2: Film Festivals and Imagined Communities. Eds. Dina Iordanova with Ruby Cheung. St. Andrews: St. Andrews Film Studies. pp.12-44. Iordanova, Dina with Ruby Cheung, eds. (2010). Film Festival Yearbook 2: Film Festivals and Imagined Communities. St. Andrews: St. Andrews Film Studies. Loist, Skadi (2011). Precarious Cultural Work: About the Organization of (Queer) Film Festivals. Screen 52:2: 268273. Rhyne, Ragan (2009). Film Festival Circuits and Stakeholders. Film Festival Yearbook 1: The Festival Circuit. Eds. Dina Iordanova, and Ragan Rhyne. St. Andrews: St. Andrews Film Studies. pp. 939. Richards, Stuart (2016). The Queer Film Festival: Popcorn and Politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Rling, Charles-Clemens (2009). Festivals as Field-Configuring Events: The Annecy International Animated Film Festival and Market. Film Festival Yearbook 1: The Festival Circuit. Eds. Dina Iordanova with Ragan Rhyne. St. Andrews: St. Andrews Film Studies. pp. 4966. Rling, Charles-Clemens and Jesper Strandgaard Pedersen (2010). Film Festival Research from an Organizational Studies Perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Management 26:3: 318323.
Show more