Tag: MyAssignment help

General Writing Instructions: Once your proposal has been approved, you can begin the task of researching and writing a thorough literature review of your topic. Your outline will help to keep your thoughts and your writing organized. I will be happy to review your outline as your paper topic develops. You must start your paper early and work on it gradually throughout the course. Responding to all the comments from your rough draft will help to ensure success on the final draft of your paper. Do not lose momentum. Continue to work consistently on your paper; you may turn it in before the due date. The final paper will include a well-developed introduction, body, and conclusion. It will be at least 8–10 pages in length (of text) and include at least 5 scholarly references. You should have a good grasp of your subject matter, and your writing should convey that. Keep your writing clear and concise. Long and awkward sentences are not impressive; good and clearly expressed ideas are. Again, checking the grading criteria will help to ensure that you earn a good grade on your paper. Checklist for your Paper I. Organization Does the paper have (in this order) a Title, Abstract, Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, References? II. Style 1. Is everything (yes, everything!) double-spaced? 2. Are all measurements and units in metric? 3. Are the units abbreviated (m for meters, mg/l for milligrams per liter, etc.)? 4. Use italics where needed (please see http://blog.apastyle.org/apastyle/italics/) 5. Is everything correctly spelled? III. Content 1. Does the title strike a balance: general enough to interest readers but specific enough to describe the contents? 2. Does the abstract adequately present the goals, methods, key results (with some actual data such as counts, averages, etc.)? 3. Does the introduction set the stage for the topic as a whole? 4. Does the introduction end with an explicit description of the hypothesis and the objective of the study? 5. Have I kept results from sneaking into the Methods section? 6. Are the methods sufficiently described so that someone else could repeat the study, or fully evaluate what we did? 7. Are all the important results expressed in words (that is, not hidden in a table and merely referred to in the text)? 8. Are all results expressed in the past tense? 9. Have I kept speculation and interpretation out of the results section? 10. Does the discussion review and interpret the key results rather than reviewing only other published studies? 11. Make sure you discuss the inadequacy of the study in the discussion? IV. References 1. Are all papers cited in the text found in the references (and vice versa)? 2. Have I limited my use of secondary sources and used primary sources? 3. Are all references formatted in APA style? 4. Have major points been backed up with appropriate references rather than forcing the reader to take my word for it? V. Tables and Figures 1. Are all tables and figures necessary? Could the information be easily expressed in the text? Is there duplication between tables and figures? 2. Are the tables and figures organized to minimize space? 3. Do all tables and figures have fully self-explanatory captions? That is, could a reader understand the figure or table without reading the rest of the paper (and vice versa)?

By this point, we have addressed multiple topics and points of view related to social media, networks, and governance. You have also had the opportunity to pen several journal articles. Please craft a research question related to social media platforms for which you can adequately provide some provisional answers through primary and secondary research. This paper is intended largely as a means to perform a literature review. That means that although you may certainly utilize primary examples, I am interested to know what the academic literature says about the topic. Has your topic been adequately researched thus far, or is the existing literature only somewhat related? Your research question and methodology statement will be due on 11/4. It should be about a page long. Please affix a provisional bibliography. Keep in mind that the text of your final paper should be no less than 8 pages long, double-spaced. Social media option: Begin by selecting a social media platform and learning the platform’s advertising tools. Hootsuite and similar services also provide detailed lessons. Then, come up with a product, service or brand, real or imagined, that you would like to promote. Select a campaign goal, such as driving traffic to your site, maximizing responses (such as clicks, likes or comments), maximizing shares, prompting user actions (such as email sign-ups, downloads, survey responses) and generating sales. Determine the optimal audience for your product or brand. Use your social media tools to target that audience and execute your campaign. Track the results. Adjust aspects of the campaign based on the results (including ad or site design, target audience, response type, etc). Document evidence of your work and curate a portfolio of your campaign.

1a. Do you believe that the police role has changed significantly since September 11, 2001? 1b. If you agree Identify and describe three ways in which it has changed. 2. Why is vertical information sharing so much more challenging than horizontal information sharing in the counterterrorism/domestic security context? 3. Who (agencies, levels of government, others) do you think should have had primary responsibility for recovery efforts following Hurricane Katrina? 4a. Why is interoperability so important? 4b. Why do you think it hasn’t already been achieved? 5a. Do you think Intelligence-led policing or Community Policing is the best model to use to achieve Homeland Security? 5b. To what degree are these two police strategies compatible or in conflict? 6a. In the aftermath of 9/11 do you think we have given up too much freedom in return for greater safety? 6b. How would you strike the balance between freedom and safety? If you were a police chief, where would you draw the lines on intelligence gathering, eavesdropping, and aggressive policing?

Write about how we can stop cyber bullying.

Write a research paper about Issues of racism in soccer.

This paper may explore the musical score in depth from among the films we discuss in class, or a film score of your choice[INCEPTION]. The topic of the paper may also be comparative between two film scores, but in any case must consider the musical characteristics, function and meaning of the score in relation to the picture and story. This paper may consist primarily of original analysis, or it may be more research-oriented. However, you must consult and cite a minimum of two outside references. DOUBLE SPACED My final paper is about the film Inception. It will explore both the themes as they relate to the characters in story and the score’s cultural influence over films and trailers that came after. My drafted title is “The Musical Ripple of Inception”. My paper will talk about why the film’s score made such a emotional impact on audiences and invented a new style of scoring.

You are encouraged to be creative when choosing a new business idea. Just bear in mind that it must be one that can be researched so you are encouraged to do some preliminary research in the EBSCO Business Source Premier or ProQuest Central databases at the eLibrary or on the internet. t: Your proposal should include the following five sections in the order presented below, and run between 7-10 pages, double-spaced, not counting your works cited and any appendices you might include, in APA (American Psychological Association) style. Your assignment should be submitted as a Word documentWord logo.png, or an equivalent format. Index Five Sections of Completed Research Proposal I. Problem or objective: Research proposals generally begin with an introductory section that describes the research problem and establishes its significance. This section answers the following kinds of questions: What exactly do you want to study? Why is it worth studying? Does the proposed study have theoretical and/or practical significance? Does it contribute to a new understanding of a phenomenon (e.g., does it address new or little-known material or does it treat familiar material in a new way or does it challenge an existing understanding or extend existing knowledge)? II. Research question: Your specific research question or hypotheses should be stated clearly at the end of the description of the problem/objective. III. Literature Review of articles published on your proposed research topic (at least two articles from scholarly journals must be included in your review): The literature review presents a discussion of the most important research and theoretical work relating to the research problem/objective. It addresses the following kinds of questions: What have others said about this area(s)? What theories address it and what do these say? What research has been done (or not done) previously? Are there consistent findings or do past studies disagree? Are there flaws or gaps in the previous research that your study will seek to remedy? IV. Procedures – Methods Section: This section describes how you will conduct your study. Regardless of the type of research you plan to do, you need to indicate how you will carry out your study so others may judge its viability. This section should cover the following four points: Subjects for study. Describe the subjects (people or objects, e.g. texts) for your study, considering carefully the type and number you need. Explain your method of selecting your subject(s) (and if a sample, describe the population and how the sample will be drawn). Discuss the subject(s) in relation to your research question or hypothesis, to availability, and to your research design. That is, you need to identify the subjects and make clear whether they will be available and how you will reach them. This section typically answers the following questions: Who or what will you study in order to collect data? Is it appropriate to select a sample from a larger pool? If so, how will you do that? How do these subjects relate to your research question(s)? Measurement. Describe the kinds of measures you intend to use and explain why you have selected these (have they been used previously? if not, have you piloted them?). A discussion of measurements generally considers the following questions: What are the key variables in your study? How will you define and measure them? Do your definitions and measurements draw on or differ from those of previous research in this area? Data-Collection Methods. Describe what you plan to actually do and the kind of research you will conduct. Your data-collection methods obviously need to be consistent with your research problem, your subjects and your measurements. This section typically considers the following question: How will you actually collect the data for your study? Analysis. Describe the kind of analysis you plan to conduct, and explain the logic and purpose of your analysis. The kind(s) of analysis you plan will, of course, be contingent on the subjects, the measures and the data collection as well as on your research question so you will need to explain how you will analyze the data you collect.

1) Many centuries lie between the composition of the Anglo-Saxon epic Beowulf and Shakespeare’s tragedy Macbeth. However, both works show how society then relied upon the relationship between a King and those who owed him service or allegiance. Contrast how kingship “works” in Beowulf with how kingship “fails” in Macbeth. 2) There are many different ways that inhabitants saw the city of London in the eighteenth-century. Contrast the perspectives of Mr. Spectator in “The Royal Exchange” and Blake’s speaker in “London.” In what ways are the two perspectives different? Do they show us two different sides of what was then the world’s largest city? 3)Both Aphra Behn’s Oroonoko and Richard Steele’s “Yarico and Inkle” (from The Spectator) contrast European values (and character) with the values and character of colonized peoples. Explain what each author sees in this opposition of European and colonized, discussing whether their insights are similar. 4) Describe (in as much detail as time permits) the two different kinds of imagery that William Blake uses to contrast the world of Innocence and the world of Experience. 5) Many critics see the “The Lady of Shallot” and “Goblin Market” as commenting on the “Woman Problem” of the Victorian era. How are the two poems similar in portraying the difficulties faced by women during the nineteenth century?

Part 2: Organizational Assessment and Action Plan This is the second part of a three-part assignment where you will be applying many of the course concepts that have been discussed in this unit and in previous units by conducting a well-researched analysis. For this part of the assignment, refer to the comments left by the instructor in your Unit VI Scholarly Activity surrounding your selected organization and department. For this assignment, you will be expanding upon the unit, department, or team you selected for the Unit VI Scholarly Activity by addressing the components listed below. Formulate an action plan to promote effective organizational change with an emphasis on conflict management policy planning. Discuss your personal strategies for managing conflict and how you could incorporate different strategies into these processes. Consider priorities that public managers and employees must possess throughout change processes. Integrate proven theories to help with rationale, input, and expected outcomes from policy changes. Discuss possible efforts and tactics for implementing change to ensure a smooth and productive transition. During this phase, you must develop a three-page action plan and utilize at least four of the sources listed in your Unit VI Scholarly Activity or selected replacements.