Do women lead differently in a business environment and in consequence does this have different outcomes for the business that they lead?

The objective of the research would be to systematically examine the leadership approaches of women in business and the consequences of their approach to business success (or otherwise). It is tentatively suggested that women do lead businesses in a differentiated manner as compared to their male counterparts, and that this approach does not fit easily within the masculine view of what business success constitutes, making it appears as if women are less successful in business in the short term. By obtaining a wider long-term perspective of female leadership in business it is hoped to make a more objective contribution to knowledge.

writing and critically discuss which would be more beneficial, external or internal drivers in an organization that needs to implement innovation and make change to survive and thrive in the automated future?

You can specify a location, business or case to assist you should you wish to. There is no one answer to any of this question. The possibilities are numerous. The important thing is that you demonstrate knowledge of the field by drawing on a range of literature found in books and journal articles. Normal academic referencing is required for this essay How you decide to approach the essay is up to you and will require some creative thinking as well as attention to how you will structure your argument. Which would be more beneficial for an organisation- external or internal drivers? What factors need to be considered before such a choice is made? Thesis statement requires an argument to answer the first question. Example: This essay will argue that (External or internal) drivers are more beneficial for an organisation … (main reasons). The factors that need to be considered before such a choice is made include (major factors). Main reasons and major factors should demonstrate that you have undertaken independent research, can identify key issues and show that you understand the literature. Discuss, in detail, the implications of and the difficulties involved with, attempting to change the structure of an organisation. Be sure to highlight not only what an organisation might gain by changing its dominant structure, but also what problems might emerge to inhibit that change effort. The criteria for evaluating this assignment are: Identification of key issues Structure of essay – formal academic structure Use of appropriate examples Demonstrated understanding of theory and appropriate literature Demonstration of analytical and critical thinking capacities Demonstrated independent research Presentation and referencing Markers will ignore those parts of the essay that exceed the word limit, and essays which are under the word limit will be considered as not representing a completed assessment task. Excessive use of quotes will be heavily penalised Writing to a set word count is a requirement in almost every profession, and presenting an argument within the bounds of a word count demonstrates partial achievement of Learning Outcome

Discuss Tucks efficacious set and responsibility for party coalitions

Tucks efficacious set and responsibility for party coalitions: In his book Free Riding Richard Tuck defend instrumental voting and argue against the claim that voting is an Olsonian problem. His conclusion is that it is rational for everyone to vote, which he support in Chapter 2 Voting and Other Thresholds through two main concepts: 1- The Efficacious Set: the number of votes needed form a candidate to win the elections under majority rule or plurality rule. Members of this set are causally and equally responsible for the election outcome. For example, in a two-candidates election (A and B) and 1000 voters, B received 360 votes, A in this case won the election with 640 votes. The efficacious set in this scenario is 361 votes, because the moment A gets one vote more than what B got, A wins the election. According to Tuck, under majority or plurality rule it is easy to prove that the membership in the efficacious set is necessary for voters to be equally and equally responsible for voting outcomes. Nevertheless, under proportional representation it is more complicated to talk about the efficacious set due to lack of transparency. Under proportional representation (PR) the position is more complicated ad it may be quite hard to talk about the properties of an efficacious set; in my view, this greater complication and lack of transparency is in itself a substantial– though not necessarily decisive– argument against PR 2- The redundant causation concept: As Tuck claims, if C is causal to E, and E happened without the occurrence of C due to other events that led to E, C is still sufficiently causal for E. The aim of this paper is to explore and argue for voters responsibility under proportional representation. The result is that voters are sufficiently causal for party coalitions which take place in the parliament after elections outcomes are announced. The following outline is preferable: 1- Explain and describe the efficacious set, and why membership in this set is crucial for being responsible of the election outcome. 2- Describe what is proportional representation, with the German electoral system as an example. 3- Describe transparency in Tucks view which is voting under uncertainty, there is no full information case in proportional representation, which causes voters to vote without knowing what their elected candidate or party will engage into after winning. 4- Formulate the question: are voters who are members of the efficacious set responsible for party coalitions in the German parliament? Taking into consideration that German voting ballot form (vote 1 for chosen candidate and vote 2 for chosen party). 5- Provide a counter argument, to the claim that voters are eventually responsible for coalitions, even if not directly. Their votes eventually were enough to get winning parties to the parliament, which consequently allowed parties to form coalitions. Minimum 15 references from academic journals and articles. The following references list is important: 1- Free Riding by Richard Tuck. 2- German Bundestag articles and report The following references are course related and may contain some related arguments: 1- Sharing Responsibility, Michael J. Zimmerman. 2- In Our Name: The Ethics of Democracy by Eric Anthony Beerbohm, Chapter 9 Democratic Complicity. 3- Against Democracy by Jason Brennan. 4- The Ethics of Voting by Jason Brennan. 5- Responsibility Voids by Mathew Braham and Martin van Hees. 6- Anatomy of Moral Responsibility by Mathew Braham and Martin van Hees.
Show more

Karl Popper tried to give a theory of how science works in which induction has no role. But could a person live a normal life at all, if they did not think induction is rational? Would such a person have reason to get on the train to work, eat food from t

Karl Popper tried to give a theory of how science works in which induction has no role. But could a person live a normal life at all, if they did not think induction is rational? Would such a person have reason to get on the train to work, eat food from their fridge, and so on? Could we really live without relying on induction? Write in a clear, direct style.

Unit 3: Journal Discussion Peer Response – Innovative Strategy; Life Cycle

MBA 695 Strategic Management Unit 3: Peer Comments to Journal Discussion Innovative Strategy; Life Cycle Stage Respond to One Peer Journal (1) peer journal discussion that you are to respond to as follows. Cover page not needed. Peer Responses It is important that you become comfortable receiving and giving constructive criticisms, since this is an important component in ones professional growth and development and a core competency for leaders. Students will be expected to read the initial posting of three peers, and then provide thoughtful comments addressing the following: a) Comments demonstrate critical thinking, application, examples, and contribute substance to discussion dialogue. b) Point out what you agree with that your peer has written in the discussion; what you perceived to be the strengths of the initial posting of the subject matter, along with supporting rationale. c) Identify specific opportunities for improvement with regard to the content in the initial posting. Furthermore, you should provide supporting rationale for your stated position, as well as concrete suggestions and guidance intended to strengthen the effectiveness of the content. FYI.THIS IS THE JOURNAL DISCUSSION QUESTION EACH PEER RESPONDED TO: Initial Posting – After completing the weekly reading, find an organization/ company that you feel is innovative and define the type of innovation (inventive, incremental, radical) and/or the category(ies) of innovative strategy they use (Dyer, et al, (2017), Chapt 10, p. 181-189 [eBook]). What life cycle stage is this company currently in? Is innovation necessary for this company at this time? Justify your viewpoints using sources for support. Title: Strategic management: Concepts and tools for creating real world strategy. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons Edition: 2 Authors: Dyer, J., Godfrey, P., Jensen, R., & Bryce, D. Publisher: Wiley, 2017 Title: Elevate: The three disciplines of advanced strategic thinking Edition: 1 Authors: Horwath, R. Publisher: John Wiley and Sons, 2014
Show more

Discuss The Ethics and Legalities of Medication Error Disclosure American writer Nikki Giovanni once said: Mistakes are a fact of life.

Assignment: The Ethics and Legalities of Medication Error Disclosure American writer Nikki Giovanni once said: Mistakes are a fact of life. It is the response to the error that counts (Goodreads, 2012). Whenever you make an error when writing a prescription, you must consider the ethical and legal implications of your errorno matter how seemingly insignificant it might be. You may fear the possible consequences and feel pressured not to disclose the error. Regardless, you need to consider the potential implications of non-disclosure. How you respond to the prescription error will affect you, the patient, and the health care facility where you practice. In this Assignment, you examine ethical and legal implications of disclosure and nondisclosure of personal error. Consider the following scenario: You are working as an advanced practice nurse at a community health clinic. You make an error when prescribing a drug to a patient. You do not think the patient would know that you made the error, and it certainly was not intentional. To prepare: Consider the ethical implications of disclosure and nondisclosure. Research federal and state laws for advanced practice nurses. Reflect on the legal implications of disclosure and nondisclosure for you and the health clinic. Consider what you would do as the advanced practice nurse in this scenario including whether or not you would disclose your error. Review the Institute for Safe Medication Practices website in the Learning Resources. Consider the process of writing prescriptions. Think about strategies to avoid medication errors. By Day 7 Write a 2- to 3- page paper that addresses the following: Explain the ethical and legal implications of disclosure and nondisclosure. Be sure to reference laws specific to your state. Describe what you would do as the advanced practice nurse in this scenario including whether or not you would disclose your error. Provide your rationale. Explain the process of writing prescriptions including strategies to minimize medication errors. at least 2 references this is the text book Arcangelo, V. P., Peterson, A. M., Wilbur, V., & Reinhold, J. A. (Eds.). (2017). Pharmacotherapeutics for advanced practice: A practical approach (4th ed.). Ambler, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Show more

Sexual Behavior:Discuss the differences between ‘normal’ and ‘deviant’ sexual behavior. What makes an act or practice ‘deviant’? Does labeling something ‘deviant’ only make sense in comparison to what is normal?

Question 1: (4 points) Discuss the differences between ‘normal’ and ‘deviant’ sexual behavior. What makes an act or practice ‘deviant’? Does labeling something ‘deviant’ only make sense in comparison to what is normal? Question 2: (4 points) Why do certain acts seem to be ‘deviant’ in some societies but ‘normal’ in others, and why do other acts seem to be universally ‘deviant’? Question 3: (4 points) Describe three types of perspectives (., statistical, sociological, psychological, medical, anthropological) used to understand what is ‘normal’ and what is ‘deviant’. Question 4: (4 points) Is one of the perspectives you described above in Question 3 better than the others, or are multiple perspectives required?

Identify the impact of this legislation on your nursing practice by choosing two key nursing provisions outlined in the topic material “Nursing and Health Reform.” Discuss how these two provisions have impacted, or will impact, your current practice of nursing.

DQ 1 The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) was passed into legislation in March of 2010. Identify the impact of this legislation on your nursing practice by choosing two key nursing provisions outlined in the topic material “Nursing and Health Reform.” Discuss how these two provisions have impacted, or will impact, your current practice of nursing. ___________________________________ DQ 2 Describe one innovative health care delivery model that incorporates an interdisciplinary care delivery team. How is this advantageous to patient outcomes? Please include references for both questions. Answers must be complete and have solid academic writing.

Write an essay exploring and reflecting on the pedagogy of relationship as presented trough Australian National and relevant State early childhood curriculum, policy and advocacy documents

Essay exploring and reflecting on the pedagogy of relationship as presented trough Australian National and relevant State early childhood curriculum, policy and advocacy documents . Additional information: Your assignment must be a format academic essay ( written in 3 red person ) with introduction, body , conclusionabs a complete APA cited only the source you actually read and cited in your essay -you must revert to Early Years Learning Framework ( DEER, 2009) as a minimum in reference to curriculum documents and can if you wish to discuss state curriculum in addition. – Reference to policy and advocacy documents may include : documents from the National Quality Framework (NQF)e.g Guide to National Quslity Standard ( NQS) , Early Childhood Australia Reconciliation Action Plan , and other government policies you find in your research . -Your essay must reflect upon what these curriculum and policy documents contain in relation to the pedagogy of relationship in early childhood education abd carw settings.First you must establish what Pedagogy of Relationship entails , and then you need to read /evaluate /critique the various documents for how they reflect these ideals .